GirlChat #360682

Start A New Topic!  Date Index  Thread Index

Going back to the source and context...

Posted by ILGO on 2006-July-10 19:23:23 EDT, Monday
  Views: 0    Likes: 0     
Lets not forget - the real enemy are predatory pedophiles*.
Antis are, in the main, good people who are misguided or misinformed.


*I know some will say no no its mostly those nasty 'situational' people. However, to my mind, they have been attracted to a child (for whatever reason) and its splitting hairs to deny them to be called predatory pedophiles. --Asterix ⛓️‍💥[Removed]

And then:

I'd like to think that there's a collective face that we can present to the world that stands a chance of leading to a path to gain social acceptability. I think that saying that 20% of people are pedophiles and those who commit offences are predatory pedophiles is a stance that should be considered. I have some thoughts and ideas on so-called situational offenders and I will posting on this when I can get my thoughts in order. --Asterix ⛓️‍💥[Removed]


I don't see how I can conclude anything else. However you said here (which I seemed to have missed the first time I read through) you planned on making a comprehensive and hopefully much more detailed and explainatory post on this subject in the near future. I'm looking forward to reading it. I'd love to see how you can explain the reams of statistics we've seen over the years that clearly demonstrate the 'nasty situational' people are not nor have they ever been paedophiles. They have no sexual attraction. True it's always dangerous to trust information from your enemies, but given the current situation our only source of statisical evidence of any kind comes from our enemies; given that their facts seem to support us I fail to understand why you see any value in tossing that away fro a pottage of predjudice and biases...

I will however stop talking with you on this subject until you are able to formulate your thoughts into a well written post that explains this to me. Otherwise I am stuck thinking you actually mean what your words imply. I try to be an open-minded man; if you can prove to me logically and from a firm foundation how these things can be--and back those assertations with links to evidence supporting your conclusions I'll have no choice but to reconsider my own positions on these things.

I eagerly await your response!

--I*Love*Green*Olives

PS: I apologize for making this a top level post but I didn't want it to be lost among the threads below!


ILGO

This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses