Erm.. is there /anyone/..

..that doubts why I refer to this one as anti now?

Well, wait.. let's be fair about this.. I say that, but let's look at the big red flag in the post: Its because I dont think that there is a sharp division, in fact I see myself as a potential child molester. Perhaps what we have here is a minority paedophile who does also fit under the "molester waiting for a victim" category and is trying to fit in in the GL community.

Yes, I read it all... every mind numbing, stomach churning word of it. This "Index" system is nothing more than a system created to show how "oh yes, every child molester in existence is a paedophile.. and I'm one of them, so it must be true!" This is like a little mini-Brian Kastel before he actually touched, trying to redeem himself for something that he is convinced he will someday do.

I realize that you are rather new around here, but I am tempted to accuse you of not actually reading the posts. The FBI's own study of convicted child molesters prove that 90% of them had absolutely zero attraction toward children. They were not paedophiles, plain and simple. For you to even sit here and argue that they were confirms my accusation of you being anti. Yes, the majority of molesters are antis, be it to fit in or to prove to themselves that they're not paedophiles so it's ok.

I do believe that we can all be in agreement now that this one has, in fact, been saying exactly what I have been saying that he has.