It's an honest question, asked of people who are not influenced by the dictates of organized religion. Child love, as I know it to be, encompasses an emotional, physical, and romantic mutual attraction between someone who is post-puberty and someone prepubescent, where the younger person comprehends the feelings of the older person and feels a similar affinity in return.

In the USA, there exists a terrible and inexcusable ignorance on the part of children. They are, for the most part, completely unaware of the reasons why older people desire to know them or touch them, or to engage in activities which are strange or unfamiliar to them.

It is very clear and true that rape, defined as an unwanted act by the subject of interest, is something which must forever be outlawed. Given this agreement by nearly all Child Lovers (pedophiles who consider the interests of, and honor the wishes of the children they love), it would appear that there are nevertheless many well-intentioned adults who do not wish to honor the desires of children themselves, and instead wish to impose a sort of "protection" which ignores these wishes. The common justification for this so-called protection usually relies on the assertion that children do not know anything about sex. Therefore, any sense of reason suggests that ignorance about sex in childhood is a major contributing factor where instances of sexual abuse are found. I believe that children who have a working knowledge of sex and all of the current issues it entails, are far, far less likely to become victims of true sexual abuse by adults. By true abuse, I am speaking of unwanted or uninformed advances by adults, and nothing else.

And so, as a pedophile who is a child lover and specifically a girl lover, I continue to feel quite jaded by a mainstream society which has yet to recognize the benefits of noting the difference between those who wish to simply use children for their own physical desires and those who truly adore children on a number of sincere levels. It would seem to me that the second group offers some great insight and information for thwarting the former group. Is this not true? What could I be missing here? What explanations exist why this is not yet recognized by the mainstream?

And why are child lovers still grouped together with rapists in 2008?







• ( http link ) For Oprah
[Anonymouse]