"If I talk about what might make pedophiles most content, then I must not care about the girls at all. Huh?"

Where were you doing that?

Its a mighty big stretch to go from;

"I'm glad we at least have two votes for the idea that the supply of 8-year-olds available as sexual partners to pedophiles "come the revolution" may be sharply limited."

and;

"The number of children who might be interested in sexual relationships with adults doesn't directly bear on the pro-contact argument as I see it. But it does bear on how pedophiles think about themselves, and how much mental and emotional effort they invest in the idea that it might be possible some day."

To "what might make pedophiles most content."

Has it ever occurred to ask the Pedos you talk to what might make them most content?

There are many of us you can talk to who value a girls right to say no. For us her freedom and our desires aren't in conflict because rape isn't what we desire.

But if you must identify pedophilia with rape, then it says nothing about Pedos and everything about you.

Though speaking of all the "bashing," I'm still waiting for you to cite something, anything, to support your hateful claim;

"You seem to think that there are only two alternatives: a girl can choose to have sex with an adult, or else she is a defective blob of protoplasm who can't think.

Again, please demonstrate me claiming that her "no" is inauthentic. I'm still waiting for all the bashing to end or to be substantiated.

But since you've very openly said that defamatory accusations can be supported because "they say it, but they don't believe it," I know that the reasonable request that you source your slurs will continue to go unheeded. Still, I wait.

Dante