The reason why you hear zero arguments against your claim is because it's just your own personal opinion, no one is going to bother trying to change your mind because they can't.
This "debate" falls under the same category as something like "Who would win in a fight? Goku or Superman?" You can continue to argue for both sides indefinitely and in the end, no one would win.
Except your premise is absolutely twisted and distasteful.
It seems to me like you're stepping on top of rape and rape victims in order to make your point be heard that circumcision is bad. Capitalizing on their pain in order to try and prove something. Telling them to "#GetOverIt" because obviously they don't know real pain since they weren't circumcised.
You could've just as easily made an argument for genital mutilation being a bad practice just by its own, without comparing it to other things, but for some reason, you decided to go the sensationalist way and start claiming that "Circumcision is worse than rape". Why? I have no idea.
Yes, I don't like genital mutilation either.
Yes, I don't like rape either.
And yes, I don't like extreme radical feminism either.
But I'm not gonna start discussing who's more of a victim because it doesn't matter. Both rape and genital mutilation are bad, that's it. End of the story.