GirlChat #428682

Start A New Topic!  Date Index  Thread Index

No...

Posted by Daniel Lievre on 2008-February-03 04:40:31 EST, Sunday
In reply to Re: A little post on my views of child porn. posted by Mesmerised on 2008-February-03 12:10:54 EST, Sunday
  Views: 3    Likes: 0     
...because I do not perceive any inherent or otherwise weighty risk of "abuse" in CP, or for that matter, any form of pornography. I feel that society may "secondarily" victimise child participants, but I am not planning for any change in the law until those perceptions have shifted.

It is this passage that I am confused by:

then I'd suggest restricting images which contained actual sex acts to the individuals themselves - i.e. allowable, if mutually desired, between lovers within relationship to each other, but not to be traded/sold/distributed. That would respect the sexual privacy of relationships whilst providing a safeguard against an abuse potential.

So as well as protecting against this supposed "abuse", you want to protect the "sexual privacy" of "relationships", even if that relationship is a working arrangement or otherwise that of partners who consent to distribution.

I just wish to be enlightened as to how you can mantain this position, if indeed you do.

Daniel Lievre

This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses