GirlChat #428761
Re: No...
Posted by Mesmerised on 2008-February-03 18:39:47 EST, Sunday
In reply to No... posted by Daniel Lievre on 2008-February-03 04:40:31 EST, Sunday
It's not genuine peds that I'm worried about; I'm concerned about a potential for other unscrupulous individuals who may abuse such new legal arrangements, perhaps seeing it as a way of making profit, perhaps directly, or by using images that others had put about on the net. I do see a danger of abuse there, of motivations other than relational ones.
You may think, in that case why also object to the non-commercial distributing of images? Because they could easily be used by others for uses which they weren't intended for or consented to at all.
I also agree with Siva's points in this thread. Pictures once shared are out there forever...
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Re: No... - Daniel Lievre on 2008-February-04 02:21:54 EST, Monday - (2 / 0 / 5)
- Re: No... - Mesmerised on 2008-February-04 03:31:19 EST, Monday - (2 / 0 / 4)
- Re: No... - LGsouL on 2008-February-04 08:34:15 EST, Monday - (2 / 0 / 3)
- http://www.annabelleigh.net/messages/428840.htm - Hierophant on 2008-February-04 09:49:01 EST, Monday - (2 / 0 / 2)
- I relpied! Thanks! :) -nt - LGsouL on 2008-February-04 09:50:27 EST, Monday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Relpied...........*replied* -nt - LGsouL on 2008-February-04 09:50:58 EST, Monday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- I relpied! Thanks! :) -nt - LGsouL on 2008-February-04 09:50:27 EST, Monday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- http://www.annabelleigh.net/messages/428840.htm - Hierophant on 2008-February-04 09:49:01 EST, Monday - (2 / 0 / 2)
- Re: No... - LGsouL on 2008-February-04 08:34:15 EST, Monday - (2 / 0 / 3)
- Re: No... - Mesmerised on 2008-February-04 03:31:19 EST, Monday - (2 / 0 / 4)