GirlChat #428807
Re: No...
Posted by Mesmerised on 2008-February-04 03:31:19 EST, Monday
In reply to Re: No... posted by Daniel Lievre on 2008-February-04 02:21:54 EST, Monday
Nothing in itself. But, as I said above, I think the possibility of unscrupulous people who are not themselves child lovers, not interested in children relationally, but interested solely in making profits from commercialised 'hardcore' child porn, is a legitimate worry. I do see a potential for exploitation there.
how exactly is someone not consenting to diverse usage by making their images public, without any kind of rights protection?
Well, fair point I guess. But once they are made public, they're public forever. What a child might be happy with at a young age they may well change their mind on later.
I suppose ultimately it's rather difficult to foresee how these kinds of things could operate - we're envisioning a future society which has legitimised adult-child sexual relations, and it's not easy to work out all the specifics from the place we are in now...
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Re: No... - LGsouL on 2008-February-04 08:34:15 EST, Monday - (2 / 0 / 3)
- http://www.annabelleigh.net/messages/428840.htm - Hierophant on 2008-February-04 09:49:01 EST, Monday - (2 / 0 / 2)
- I relpied! Thanks! :) -nt - LGsouL on 2008-February-04 09:50:27 EST, Monday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Relpied...........*replied* -nt - LGsouL on 2008-February-04 09:50:58 EST, Monday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- I relpied! Thanks! :) -nt - LGsouL on 2008-February-04 09:50:27 EST, Monday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- http://www.annabelleigh.net/messages/428840.htm - Hierophant on 2008-February-04 09:49:01 EST, Monday - (2 / 0 / 2)