The statements I made questioning their modives were made before those announcements came through. I'm still not convinced of their actual modives. Their connection with AZU and the initial wording of their rules both contribute to a bad feeling I get about them.

The moderator thing, I wasn't even convinced was true at first, though you've convinced me that their offer has been genuinely extended. The rule change, I can possibly see as being an honest mistake on their part. It's possible they didn't actually mean anything by it, and it's just hard for them to break the habit of reffering to us that way.

The rule change is a positive step, and has definately improved my view of them, although my natural paranoia remains. It's going to take time for me to feel I can trust these people, but for the moment I'm willing to listen to them when they claim they're attempting neutrality.

We'll see where this goes, but I'm not retracting my earlier suspicions. I still feel they were warented. They may prove me wrong, but I still feel, considering the history here, that the burdon is on them to prove that.