GirlChat #604691

Start A New Topic!  Submit SRF  Thread Index  Date Index  

Re: Weird ass place

Posted by Butterfly Kisses on Wednesday, October 29 2014 at 06:54:50AM
In reply to Re: Weird ass place posted by Dissident on Wednesday, October 29 2014 at 05:28:24AM

Translation: I dislike the fact that the majority of posters here are pro-choice, because I don't agree with the stance, and because the progress isn't happening overnight, then it's safe to claim it's not going to happen. But I think it would happen quicker if they all adopted the anti-choice stance.

It's odd that you think I am against adult/child sexual relationships when as far I can remember I have never stated one way or another on this board. I remember giving arguments in both directions before to see what answers people would give in response to my statements but I certainly don't remember ever saying one way or another as to what I actually believe.

The only place I have ever done so is in VOA chat if I remember right and I'll go ahead and share it. I do not advocate one position or another at this time due to the fact that if I or anyone else were to have a sexual relationship with a minor the harm coming from psychiatry on the minor would be enough to make it reprehinsible for someone to put the child through that.

If society changed to a point where pedophiles weren't treated as an automatic monster and debate were to begin on the subject I will at that time state a position as to what degree I think adult/child sexual relationships should be accepted.

I don't think an anti adult/child sexual relationship stance is needed for activism to go better nor do I think anyone should advocate for something against what they believe. I do, however think it would be better if people like Ethan paved the way before us with more acceptance and anyone else involved with activism would focus more on treating pedophiles with respect rather than going straight into adult/child sex which automatically tunes people out. But, that is my opinion.

The majority here spends too much time arguing with the anti-choice MAPs rather than embracing them, and that irks me. I think they should listen without countering.

I and others have been told we should not be allowed to be around children (the favorite insult of this board) and some other personal insults. Not to mention being called on multiple instances an anti which was highly amusing.

What I was specifically mentioning here though was how many times I've seen new people asking for help and if they aren't 100% for adult/child sex their ask for help will be completely ignored many times and instead it will turn into a discussion of just how self-hating they are and whether they are capable of accepting themselves and how much they need to accept the reality of how much adult/child sexual relationships need to happen.

Wrong. This board gets numerous hits, with the majority of "hitters" never signing up for an account. The "hated person of the day" most likely means the latest anti-choicer who frequently picks fights, and gets heated debates as a result.

I read this board long before I signed up. Usually refreshing several times per day and always using a different proxy. I'm sure many pedophiles do the same.

As for the hated person of the day. No I am not talking about Ethan who is clearly enjoying getting everyone riled up. It's others including me who have been pretty viciously attacked for some pretty mundane comments over the past couple of years.

Translation: It's irksome to me to see people who espouse obviously anti ideologies to have them being called on it. This is because I support that ideology more than the pro-choice ideology. But a spade shouldn't be expected to stand behind being called a spade, because exposure brings too much attention to our actual agenda, thus making the carrying out of that agenda more difficult.

And zero evidence of any anti activism? That statement means you either see only what you want to throughout society, or you're just throwing that out there in the actual hope the newbie you're addressing is as willing to read as selectively as you have. Since I do not think you're a stupid or naive person, I conclude you must think the newbie and perhaps a few others on this board are stupid or naive.


Absolute zero and others haven't had any activity in years. As far as I know the only anti activity left is one anon twitter account who one time tried to find the identity of someone on boychat. Then there was over a year ago a dos attack against this site.

But, as far as people trying to out people. I haven't hear anything. It was a bad choice of words on my part because I meant to say I haven't heard of any activism in terms of outing. Which many on this board imply repeatedly is still actively going on.

And sorry, but hatred against MAPs and the systemic attempts to maintain a gerontocentric society is not a half-baked conspiracy theory. It's written in the laws, and openly and very blatantly made clear in the media every single time you hear of a person being arrested for looking at pictures, or an article or newscast mentions "sexual predators," or a teen arrested for sexting, or hear the latter referred to as a "problem" that the law needs to address.

I never disagreed with that. I disagree with the people who seem to think that there are only a few high ranking politicians who are almost all repbublican that control all the strings and if only they were gotten rid of laws would be accepting of adult/child sexual relationships. Without them understanding that many people are against our right to exist, much less anything about whether adult/child sex should be ok.


Translation: This board should listen to the comments made by the anti-choicers, no matter how insulting and condescending, and never counter. Just listen and say, "You know, you have a point there..."

The arguments with Ethan don't really bug me that much other than the fact that you and others have made up things about people. And then that others have gone into personal attacks which I will admit you have never done.

It's when someone comes here genuinly looking for help. And might not have a total acceptance 100% of adult/child sex and the problem or plea for help is ignored and the only thing this board cares about is their positions because their here to argue.


Translation: Instead, it's a majority of pro-choicers with minority pride who do not consider their feelings to be inherently destructive to younger people, and believe that younger people have as much right to full citizenship as anyone over 18, and who irk me to no end by frequently countering any anti-choicer who shoves their ideology at them. And since I don't agree with the pro-choice ideology, this annoys the hell out of me. And this is why I consider "refutations" and referring to those who blatantly tote anti attitudes as anti's to be "insults." This is also why I perceive the frequent condescending and insulting comments by the anti-choicers to simply be calls for "support." It's the pro-choicers only who are biased, not me! Not Ethan! And I wish they would stop referring to those with blatantly anti views as anti's, dammit! There are no anti's around here, and saying otherwise is simply being paranoid! Posters like Ethan are simply realistic pedos asking for support who happen not to agree with the paranoid pedos here 100%.

Ethan is clearly not here for support and is here to debate. It's not what I am reffering to in terms of who to help. But, I do through him into the mix on both sides as to insults. As I felt his posts have been insulting to others, and have said as much on two occasions when I felt that his posts were, and and the numerous insults and lies directed at him which went far overboard.

But, still none of that bugs me as much as somoene new coming on here and people thinking it's their religious duty to convert them into pro adult/child sexual contact and ignore their problems.

Or having to deal with the insults like I did making a post that is in my mind a positive post and having to deal with people suddenly saying I shouldn't be allowed to take care of children anymore.

In conclusion I think you and others need to be very careful about the assumptions you are making as I've seen even you make a lie (that Ethan thinks child porn laws as they are now are just great when he has stated the opposite) to support your view.

While you aren't involved in the group I'm calling out for insulting and bashing other posters your steoreotyping and assumptions about people that are blatantly wrong can be quite harmful.

That being said I'm glad your a part of this board when your here.


Tote

verb (used with object), toted, toting.
1.
to carry, as on one's back or in one's arms:
to tote a bundle.
2.
to carry on one's person:
to tote a gun.
3.
to transport or convey, as on a vehicle or boat.

-Once again I have not reviewed this for grammer, or coherent thought. I am terribly sorry if some sentences make no sense.-







Follow ups:

Post a response :

Nickname Password
E-mail (optional)
Subject







Link URL (optional)
Link Title (optional)

Add your sigpic?