GirlChat #604684

Start A New Topic!  Submit SRF  Thread Index  Date Index  

Re: Weird ass place

Posted by Dissident on Wednesday, October 29 2014 at 05:28:24AM
In reply to Re: Weird ass place posted by Butterfly Kisses on Wednesday, October 29 2014 at 03:09:25AM

This board has a bunch of big talkers who think their making progress.

Translation: I dislike the fact that the majority of posters here are pro-choice, because I don't agree with the stance, and because the progress isn't happening overnight, then it's safe to claim it's not going to happen. But I think it would happen quicker if they all adopted the anti-choice stance.

When in actuality they spend more time ripping other pedophiles to shreds than doing anything to help pedophiles out in the long haul.

The majority here spends too much time arguing with the anti-choice MAPs rather than embracing them, and that irks me. I think they should listen without countering.

Self congratulatory insulting of the person o[r] hated person of the day does nothing as most people in this board somehow cannot understand that their supposedly world changing posts are not being read by anything other than a small handful (comparatively to world population) of pedophiles and maybe a couple of others.

Wrong. This board gets numerous hits, with the majority of "hitters" never signing up for an account. The "hated person of the day" most likely means the latest anti-choicer who frequently picks fights, and gets heated debates as a result.

It's almost amusing to see the endless crap of people accusing other people on this board of being antis when there is zero evidence of any actual anti activism, and there hasn't been (except for a very short time with anon.) for a long time.

Translation: It's irksome to me to see people who espouse obviously anti ideologies to have them being called on it. This is because I support that ideology more than the pro-choice ideology. But a spade shouldn't be expected to stand behind being called a spade, because exposure brings too much attention to our actual agenda, thus making the carrying out of that agenda more difficult.

And zero evidence of any anti activism? That statement means you either see only what you want to throughout society, or you're just throwing that out there in the actual hope the newbie you're addressing is as willing to read as selectively as you have. Since I do not think you're a stupid or naive person, I conclude you must think the newbie and perhaps a few others on this board are stupid or naive.


And then for all the half-baked conspiracy theories floating around here I don't think most people on this board live in the real world because most people here don't understand the public opinion against us and seem to think if only a few rich right wingers were to get overthrown we'd be living in pedo paradise.


There is the "pedo paradise" claim again. No, the majority of us are well aware that contemporary left-wingers, and people without considerable financial means, are every bit as against us as any wealthy right-winger. The same was the case with all other oppressed minority groups in the past before their time came. Some of us ask for change with the structure of the system because we dislike it for reasons that go well beyond its effects on MAPs or even youths alone. And many of us are much more familiar or acknowledging of history, which makes it clear that the hatred and suppression/oppression of us is not unique in the annals of human civilization, as it's happened many times before to other groups... and never lasted.

And sorry, but hatred against MAPs and the systemic attempts to maintain a gerontocentric society is not a half-baked conspiracy theory. It's written in the laws, and openly and very blatantly made clear in the media every single time you hear of a person being arrested for looking at pictures, or an article or newscast mentions "sexual predators," or a teen arrested for sexting, or hear the latter referred to as a "problem" that the law needs to address.

Your rant, my friend, is based on one major thing: You disagree with the majority stance on this board, and you're venting about it to a newbie whom you believe gave you an opportunity to do so by making a post that you felt gave you the required "opening." But it's good to hear from you again anyway!

This board should be supportive.

Translation: This board should listen to the comments made by the anti-choicers, no matter how insulting and condescending, and never counter. Just listen and say, "You know, you have a point there..."

Instead it's nothing but a handful of paranoid pedophiles that come here for the most part to insult anyone who doesn't 100% tote their version of what pedophilia should be.

Translation: Instead, it's a majority of pro-choicers with minority pride who do not consider their feelings to be inherently destructive to younger people, and believe that younger people have as much right to full citizenship as anyone over 18, and who irk me to no end by frequently countering any anti-choicer who shoves their ideology at them. And since I don't agree with the pro-choice ideology, this annoys the hell out of me. And this is why I consider "refutations" and referring to those who blatantly tote anti attitudes as anti's to be "insults." This is also why I perceive the frequent condescending and insulting comments by the anti-choicers to simply be calls for "support." It's the pro-choicers only who are biased, not me! Not Ethan! And I wish they would stop referring to those with blatantly anti views as anti's, dammit! There are no anti's around here, and saying otherwise is simply being paranoid! Posters like Ethan are simply realistic pedos asking for support who happen not to agree with the paranoid pedos here 100%.

Btw, I like the word "tote," as I haven't seen it used before. I hope you've been well.



Dissident





Follow ups:

Post a response :

Nickname Password
E-mail (optional)
Subject







Link URL (optional)
Link Title (optional)

Add your sigpic?