GirlChat #737483

Start A New Topic!  Submit SRF  Thread Index  Date Index  

Maybe or maybe not the same case?

Posted by Gimwinkle on Tuesday, January 12 2021 at 10:48:49PM
In reply to Maybe someone can find this case for me posted by sans on Tuesday, January 12 2021 at 10:01:35PM

The article I read was from an actual court transcript of a guy's conviction. I'm certainly not sure, but I think it was in New Jersey? East Coast for sure. 1990's

I had been transcribing someone else's case and read (as I typed) of the New Jersey? case. The defense argued that the defendant (who had a perfectly legal image of a child) had violated no laws because the image was not pornographic nor illegal in any way. The prosecution asked the defendant if he found the image sexually appealing. The defendant replied that he was sexually aroused by the photo. He was convicted of having child pornography. I read of the reference because it had been appealed. (If it was overturned or not, I don't recall.)

But that case was from 30 to 40 years ago in the States.

Follow ups:

Post a response :

Nickname Password
E-mail (optional)

Link URL (optional)
Link Title (optional)

Add your sigpic?