GirlChat #734931
US Supreme Court 1964 Civil Rights Act
Posted by hierophant on 2020-June-15 14:52:53 EDT, Monday"An employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex," he wrote. "The limits of the drafters' imagination supply no reason to ignore the law's demands."
I know we are talking about employment here but. How often is it that a man doing a female thing with children is put under suspicion or arrested. While a female behaving the same with children isn't even considered suspicious.
The law may not be sexist but its application often is.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- yeah, I dunno... - Eeyore on 2020-June-16 03:10:37 EDT, Tuesday - (17 / 0 / 2)
- And I didn't miss your point - Eeyore on 2020-June-16 03:20:13 EDT, Tuesday - (21 / 0 / 1)
- lol - luckless on 2020-June-16 03:51:26 EDT, Tuesday - (16 / 0 / 0)
- And I didn't miss your point - Eeyore on 2020-June-16 03:20:13 EDT, Tuesday - (21 / 0 / 1)
- You can get away with murder - sans on 2020-June-15 16:44:24 EDT, Monday - (17 / 0 / 4)
- - - Eeyore on 2020-June-19 03:08:06 EDT, Friday - (16 / 0 / 0)
- What I've read - Hajduk on 2020-June-17 22:44:56 EDT, Wednesday - (18 / 0 / 2)
- Different thing - hierophant on 2020-June-19 02:15:04 EDT, Friday - (21 / 0 / 1)
- Not always - Hajduk on 2020-June-19 03:05:19 EDT, Friday - (20 / 0 / 0)
- Different thing - hierophant on 2020-June-19 02:15:04 EDT, Friday - (21 / 0 / 1)