GirlChat #428919
What about (reply to both)...??
Posted by lgsinmyheart on 2008-February-04 22:49:32 EST, Monday
In reply to I disagree... posted by lgsinmyheart on 2008-February-04 06:53:49 EST, Monday
So, all that said, why would it simply not happen that your average tv matinee coming-of-age film would have some sex scenes with the 11yo??
Now, is that or is that not porn???
I am simply pointing out to something that's always bugged me - that porn is considered a separate genre from anything else, which I don't think is true. You can make a piece of any genre and put explicit sex into it. In that sense, I think "porn for the sake of porn", ie, the type of videos / movies where the whole action is a sex scene with no outside plot at all, will probably disappear or become a very niche market [*]. But I see no reason why porn with actual stories (which is still not uncommon in more softcore productions) will disappear, and I do see explicit sex scenes becoming integrated into mainstream movies and television.
[* Within that niche market reasoning, I can see more "porn for the sake of porn" being shot with "non-porn" celebrities, as part of treats to fans, eg, but I still don't think there would be all that much material done in this way.]
Would that be less porn, or more porn, or the same but distributed differently??
I don't know, really...
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Re: What about (reply to both)...?? - LGsouL on 2008-February-05 06:09:19 EST, Tuesday - (2 / 0 / 2)
- Re: What about (reply to both)...?? - lgsinmyheart on 2008-February-05 07:18:18 EST, Tuesday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- You know what's funny? - LGsouL on 2008-February-05 07:49:11 EST, Tuesday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: What about (reply to both)...?? - lgsinmyheart on 2008-February-05 07:18:18 EST, Tuesday - (2 / 0 / 1)