I think you are looking at the number of crimes against children and saying "most are by teleios and few by pedos"

Which is the only way you can look at it in order to make public policy.

Every police department in the world knows you cannot prevent the rare, but noisy, spree killers. But every police department knows you can prevent the much more common, but much less media-friendly, killings related to street crime.

Every police department knows that policies designed against spree killings will be neutral to worse for overall murder rates. But you prefer them.

How likely is it that a given teleio is going to molest a child, and how likely it is that a pedo is going to. Since there are so many more teleios, the percentage of them who molest is much lower.

How likely is it that a given not-spree-killer is going to murder a child, and how likely is it that a spree-killer is going to. Since there are so many more not-spree-killers, the percentage of them to murder is much lower.

The next question is what is the top age of what counts as "child". When the statistics pertain to minors and we're including young teens, then the great majority of "molesters" will be teleios attracted to adults -- because those are adults -- or at most we'll get some of our hebephiles.

Disingenuos.

You know very well that the statistics are like that because the AOC is like that.

If you don't like the statistics being like that, then complain about the AOC.

As long as you don't care to complain about the AOC, you have to STFU about its consequences, for statistics gathering as for anything else.