in posters we can discern two ways of responding to a subject

one is disinterest: they don't respond at all

another form of response is attacking the poster either by invective or ridicule

this is a way of saying the the poster's idea is infeasible or otherwise to be dismissed

it is an attempt to make sure that the poster's suggestion is not taken seriously

we see both types of response from members of the GC Committee

if we see this consistent behavior from a member of a GL governing board we can suspect he or she is not there really here to support GL's.

As some of you may know by reading the newspaper regularly or the history of the FBI attacks on leftwing groups in the 1960's and 1970's, it was a common tactic of the FBI have their agents or informants placed on the administrations of some of these groups

This would be expected in the case of MAP groups

we have to think about inner motive: what motive would a real GL to attack another GL?