The above was an attempt to find reasons for pedophilia other than genetic ones.
The only alteration I would make were I to repost it would be; "To me, the attraction is more emotional than physical, although I do not deny the physical side of it".

And how, pray tell, is it preposterous to assert the desirability, FROM A RACIAL STANDPOINT, of not adding to the overcrowding of the planet?

If you want to be picky, saying that the attraction is more physical than emotional would indicate to some that you are not, first and foremost, concerned with HER needs, but your own gratification. That means that YOU are not a true ped in the eyes of many. Since I don't do "Holier Than Thou" when avoidable, I will refrain from judgement.

That was not a theory but an opinion based upon observation when I mentioned the seemingly* concomitant rise of pedophilia with the advent of the women's movement.
As to those who became peds because of disillusionment with women, I reported what I have been personally told, face-to-face, by many members of this forum.
Your condemnation of them on the illogically-assumed basis that they "cannot handle women" does seem to be a knee-jerk, albeit common, reaction. There is a huge difference between "not being able to handle" and being unwilling to be arsed when there is a better alternative.

If you really want to know how I became a ped, do a GC search under my name. It has been written out in complete detail.

Finally, ask yourself this: "Who does pedophilia REALLY threaten"?


*"seemingly": pedophilia has a long and honorable history; over the long course of human history, it has only recently been condemned.