Yeah, it's a bad law, but you should respect laws, and take the correct steps to have them changed, not simply skirt them in protest. It's not just you you put at risk when skirting the law, but kids as well, which is a ridiculous way to show you care about them, when the very issue is their lack of maturity, which can be expressed through formal protest.

It's very difficult to prove that police turn a blind eye towards pedos, especially when they're not offenders. It just seems like speculation. You could say the same thing about turning a blind eye towards minorities or abortionists depending on the individual alignments of each officer or group of officers. Either way, that would be police shirking their duty, and if they'll do that anyway how exactly is changing the law (which already defends pedos) going to make a bit of difference?

As for having a march, yeah, there'll be vigilante justice, but lots of marches face that problem. The cops will try but they can only do so much. Not only are marches unwise but they're also a kind of stupid approach which focuses on 'accepting' what is classed as a damage-inducing insanity which victimizes the vulnerable. You have to have marches to empower youths and promote AoC shifts, not for 'accept us pedos'. Egads. Honestly, may as well have a 'pro-zoophilia' march while you're at it.

As for houses, if you own the house and are forced to sell it, you still get money from it. As for being forced to move: THIS ONLY HAPPENS TO CRIMINALS. Yeah, it's pretty silly to only discriminate against sex offenders (I don't think a murderer should be able to live in proximity to ANY humans, much less only children) but that's a separate issue. It's noy only convicted molesters being discriminated against here, but all sex offending criminals, and is simply not an issue at all for law-abiding folk so you don't drag em into it.

Same issue applies to the registry lists: again silly to selectively discriminate against the minor crime of rape (in comparison to murder and assault) when condemning criminals who have served their sentences, but that is what you should address, not "they're taking our homes!". Address the hypocrisy, not punishment you don't like, because a lot of criminals don't like their punishments. You have to emphasize equality and not 'get rid of the punishment'. Maybe if you have all criminals facing similar discrimination you'll have a larger group to get it removed.

I agree the paranoia is pretty bad, but that's more of a person issue, the government can't dictate people's attitudes towards pedos, free thought and all even if ignorantly (and it's not completely ignorant, just misapplied) founded. Organizing and spreading messages like with sites and arguing with antis will be the slow process that can turn some reasonable minds. We live in an age where people still hate gays and blacks, there will always be haters.

I'm not exactly familiar with this riot you talk about, only that in general with riots, when people don't know anything, they're quickly to assume police oppression and brutality, when really, police are generally some fine people, and protestors are commonly one-track ponies out to blame the police for the problem as if they're the ones drafting the decisions that they're protesting.