It looks to me mainly that the Attorney General is calling a lot of attention to the length of your complaint, overall telling me basically that he is trying to get the judiciary to ignore the complaint and basically try to use any possible lack of legal procedure against you hoping to base their dissmissal on extremely loosely related precedents.

I for one hope the Judiciary looks over this one with a very fine toothed comb and takes into consideration the purjury question which they make no statement to defend against in either the original motion to dismiss or the Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Response.

I also hope they take into account the bad faith complaint which again IAG failed to counter.

I'm extremely appalled that their using such lowball attacks against you, clearly Indiana isn't playing by the book, if anything all I really got out of this was that IAG is trying to use whatever [he] can to discredit you to pull attention away from any strong points you have in your complaint.

Again though IANAL nor do I attempt to give any real logicial assessment of this case. But I wish you the best as this precedent will effect us all for years to come.

My fear: The laws against us will become too strong to fight and the prescedence will move past pedophilia into other beliefs/orientations/etc. where the US will unwittingly force revolt. So much for a nation that was built on tollerance of a mixed belief system.

~Stormy