This post will likely be introduced as evidence into the custody trial for my son. My two previous updates have been so introduced by the State. To date, Indiana MCOFC has indicated their intentions by the following actions:

My son has not been permitted to visit with his paternal grandparents in four months, despite weekly requests during that time period.

My son has not been allowed into relative foster care yet, despite my mother and father in-law retaining an attorney to see the Judge's order for such arrangements implemented. It has been two months since they completed all requirements for him to be so-placed. He is still with strangers.

Indiana MCOFC will not allow my wife to perform her "service recomendations" concurrently, in contradiction of their own policy manual, despite her "agreed entry" and becoming a hostile witness to my defense, in an attempt to stall her completion of such services to the six-month mark from removal of my son and Federal mandatory commencement of termination of parental rights for my estranged wife.

Indiana MCOFC will not allow my supervised visitation to be videotaped, despite weekly request for same.

My website is being introduced by my defense as evidence in the trial. I am subject to a monthly bandwidth constraint at the moment. The Site is distributed under terms of the GNU Free Documentation License and I encourage mirroring. It will be archived on the GLarchive site. Please advise me if you are mirroring so that I can advise you of updates. If you are interested in mirroring, it is available in entirety in a zip file. If you intend to view the entire site, please consider downloading the zip file to view on your local hard drive (unzip and click on the "index" file in the root directory) as it will help me conserve bandwidth until I am able to resolve my bandwidth constraint.

The trial resumes Wednesday, July 20th, 2005 in the superior Judge's court. The following motions presented to the Court by my defense will be considered:

---

SCHEDULE OF MOTIONS AND RESPECTIVE EXHIBITS

CAUSE NO: [EDIT]
IN RE: THE MATTER OF [EDIT] BROWN [EDIT](Child)
June 23, 2005

RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND/OR STRIKE

Petitioner's Exhibit A - MCOFC Caseworker's 310 Preliminary Report
Petitioner's Exhibit B - Rick Robert's Transcript "Phyllis" Interview
Petitioner's Exhibit C -Family Safety Plan
Petitioner's Exhibit D - MOCFC Caseworker's Contact Log Report (interview with Kevin)
Petitioner's Exhibit E - Rick Robert's Transcript

RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO OPEN HEARING TO THE PUBLIC

Petitioner's Exhibit A - Rick Robert's Transcript
Petitioner's Exhibit B - Memo with "service recommendations"
Petitioner's Exhibit C - Post on SOT Experience
Petitioner's Exhibit D - APA Statement on Converting Homosexuals
Petitioner's Exhibit E - Letter from ICLU

MOTION TO INTRODUCE EXHIBIT EVIDENCE (Pedfoundation.org Website)

RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE TO STATE'S MOTION TO COMPEL CONDUCT

RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT - SEIZURE AUTHORITY

RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DECLARE WITNESS HOSTILE ON DIRECT

RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS IDACS REPORT

Petitioner's Exhibit A - IPD IDACS Report
Petitioner's Exhibit B - JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE 1:97CR00125-001

RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR A BILL OF PARTICULARS - IPD REPORT

RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR A BILL OF PARTICULARS - EPSDT REPORT

RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR A BILL OF PARTICULARS - IYAP VISITATION NOTES

---

I have redacted the names of the MCOFC caseworkers involved in the kidnapping of my son from all public forums to avoid any appearance of creating a threatening environment to the Court. I am not legally obligated to do so; it is clearly within my right under Indiana Statute to release said names.

The United States of America is a country governed by the rule of law, and the law applies equally to all of her Citizens. I have evidence in my possession and previously submitted in motion to the Juvenile Court that the MCOFC Caseworkers who seized my son on or about the night of March 7, 2005, engaged in a conspiracy to seize him in violation of the Fourth Amendment, particularly by failing to file a "complete and truthful" report to the Initial Hearing Judge Pro Tem (specifically, failing to include the written Family Safety Plan presented to the MCOFC Caseworker on or about the evening of March 7, 2005, and other evidence of precautions presented same regarding my and my wife's safeguards in place to protect my son).

I repeat my call to United States District Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana Susan W. Brooks to begin preparation in seeking a grand jury indictment against the MCOFC Caseworker, her "John Doe" counterpart, and her MCOFC supervisor with respect to violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 Conspiracy Against Rights, and the underlying offense of the conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. 120 Kidnapping.

This crime is a serious matter and is a capital offense, punishable by lethal injection. Regardless of the outcome of the CHINs proceeding involving my son, I will devote the rest of my life to seeing justice served and the fullest sentence carried out by the U.S. Department of Justice. I served in uniform to preserve your freedom; my family did not deserve this grave violation of ours.

Kevin Brown
Director, Pedfoundation.org
Indianapolis, Indiana USA