And so the arguments go, regarding people who have gone through puberty, there is a clear level of unfairness between those born with a male body and a female body. I recently found this topic interesting, because it made me wonder how different were the abilities between males and females who had not yet reached puberty. Then I started wondering how long after puberty do the physical or athletic abilities present? Is it very quickly, or does it take some more time?

After all that, I wondered where do people stand? It wouldn't be much of a surprise to anyone, I hope, that for post-pubescent individuals, things have become quite "clownish" in my opinion. Born-males absolutely bashing female records. Somewhere is a saying along the lines of "Female is not a costume." When it comes down to it, bodies are different. Even levels of estrogen or testosterone at some current time, does not negate things like muscle mass or bone structure.

I am reminded of a now somewhat old podcast by comedian Bill Burr, who said somewhere regarding adult men competing in women's sports.. (paraphrasing) that "he might as well be beating the women over the head with his own dick" ...in terms of flagrantly cheating in terms of undeniable biology. I found that description incredibly funny, because to me, he seemed to completely nail it well before the Joe Rogans of the world ever took a stand.

It is not such a far limb for me to take the side of girls and women on this one, but I also have one foot in pre-pubescence and post-pubescence in terms of my own attractions to female girls. I was just wondering what others think about the topic, which lately seems to be making the rounds.