Fact is, he has legal precedents for everything he's pursuing. In fact, he could really screw over millions of people if he wanted to take this to the extremes for which there are precedents from similar legal cases, and combined all those precedents into one.

Someone on BC pointed out that this would be good for us, in flowering open the fungus that is cp laws. Exposing the ridiculousness of it all. This is not the first cp case where the public is against rather than sleepily pro, but it could turn out to be one of the most influential ones.