GirlChat #736762
It's a bit more complicated than that
Posted by Gimwinkle on 2020-November-09 03:55:40 EST, Monday
In reply to Criminal proceeds should not remain in the hands posted by sans on 2020-November-09 00:36:26 EST, Monday
It really wouldn't matter if the "thief" of that BC wallet gave all that money back or not. All that has to happen, in the Bank's view, is make sure the "thief" CAN'T spend it. That would give the "thief" lots of economic power. The Banks have the options to either burn it all, freeze it where it is, kill the "thief", or otherwise make the money (where it is at) so none of it can be used. Then, if needed, the Fed just prints more.
Years ago, I forget the exact story, a team of bank robbers got away with hundreds of thousands of dollars. The cops really weren't that hot on getting the money back, they just wanted to get those who HAD it. Why didn't they care? All the money was explosively painted with red dye once it left the bank. (Poor robbers: all that work to get away with it and "it" was just useless paper.)
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- It is - sans on 2020-November-09 04:10:50 EST, Monday - (14 / 0 / 3)
- Exactly - Gimwinkle on 2020-November-10 03:51:26 EST, Tuesday - (15 / 0 / 2)
- Conspiracy or not etc. - sans on 2020-November-11 23:29:55 EST, Wednesday - (14 / 0 / 1)
- Economic gin and tonic - Gimwinkle on 2020-November-13 14:15:04 EST, Friday - (15 / 0 / 0)
- Conspiracy or not etc. - sans on 2020-November-11 23:29:55 EST, Wednesday - (14 / 0 / 1)
- Exactly - Gimwinkle on 2020-November-10 03:51:26 EST, Tuesday - (15 / 0 / 2)