GirlChat #735212

Start A New Topic!  Submit SRF  Thread Index  Date Index  


Posted by summerdays on Sunday, July 05 2020 at 0:51:01PM
In reply to It's a shaky defense posted by sans on Monday, June 29 2020 at 00:57:09AM

"I don't know if the images/videos in question could be argued to be erotica, and not fitting the federal definition of CP."

A good point. The bar for erotica where minors are involved is incredibly low. It doesn't have to be explicit hardcore, it doesn't even have to be nude. And the room for interpretation when the defendant himself admits to having sexual thoughts about children...

He's hammering the nails into his own coffin.


Follow ups:

Post a response :

Nickname Password
E-mail (optional)

Link URL (optional)
Link Title (optional)

Add your sigpic?