Is it too broad a conspiracy thought to wonder if all those years of mainstream media obsessing about pedophilia like it was a new concern, might have had uses connected to people like Epstein, who was apparently working for one or several national intel agencies around the same time to get various world leaders and other influential people into highly compromising situations with underage girls and probably boys as well?

In other words, at the same time you are getting leverage over these people with sex scandals, you are also promoting virulent hatred in the media among the general population for these very things; to do it to the point that these global movers and shakers realize their lives are definitely over in a heartbeat if they ever dare to work against what might be a worldwide globalist cabal working in the shadows.

I have always been extremely interested in the timing of this ginned up hatred of pedos and its timing. I wondered if it was just the natural result of the Wild West days of the internet when people of all ages suddenly had unrestricted communication with one another. I wondered if it was simply to maximize fear and mistrust in the wake of 9/11. I even wondered if it was to discredit the Pope when he wasn't getting onboard with the invasion of Iraq, as surely all the intel agencies of the world must have know about the many centuries of pedophilia in the church, especially toward boys.

Could this latest thought have any merit? Were they just simultaneously intensifying the villainous mark of engaging with even slightly underage models who appeared to be older? Is there another Epstein out there charged with getting these big names to go even younger to have even more compromising proof to hold against them as blackmail?

I still wonder why those years saw the heat getting turned up to eleven during those years. I know it became profitable to make television content where the pedo gets caught and brought to justice and all of that, but I think that was just a side benefit. I think there was another purpose, tactical in nature, and having nothing at all to do with the concern for the welfare of children.

I'm wondering if anyone else ever ponders this.