Sigh.

You change the subject at will and deny plain reality. I asked:

Has a teen's social media account been shut down solely because they argued in favor of legalizing adult-child sex?

Show me the few of your sentences that identify someone who meets that condition. Fayla plainly does not. She was attacked because she admitted to an illegal relationship, surely not SOLELY because she argued in favor of legalizing adult-child sex.

You plug in one of your cassette tapes (as the old saying might go) and say something that's sort of related to the subject at hand, at great length.

That's the way it is in all your other replies to me in this round. It's a step above Monty Python's "argument" sketch, but not much:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDjCqjzbvJY