Re: Ping: Ethan Edwards

"(I'm glad we at least have two votes for the idea that the supply of 8-year-olds available as sexual partners to pedophiles "come the revolution" may be sharply limited.)"

You've got a very sick view of sexuality. Women's choice is not and never was about supplying you with p*ssy. RLY. Get over yourself already. If you can't see a liberated woman as something other than a masturbatory tool then I sure as h*ck wouldn't trust you around a child.

My formulation was neutral. I didn't say they were available for the taking, and I didn't say it was all about sex.

Suppose I say, "The supply of young men available as sexual partners to the women of France after World War I was sharply limited". Does this imply that I think the young men were sitting on a shelf ready to be bought as meat by the women, or that they were looking for nothing but an appropriate organ to stuff their vaginas with, or that it was a matter of cold economics with no passion involved?

I'd say you cast your interpretation on my neutral description, based on this opinion you've developed that I have a callous view of sexuality -- an opinion that I don't think you have any evidence for.