Not quite the same

You are quite mistaken to call them the same as the mass. The mass was ever against pedo ideas. However the homosexual agenda used to be one with ours blanketed under sexual liberation. However feminist ideologs viewed rising homosexuality as a challenge to their platform and went out of their way to block the gay activism. Society of course sided with women against a primarally male drivin activism and progress slowed. So to get into the good graces of women again the gay and human rights charters expelled their unacceptable parts that either threatened women's dominion over sexual capital or their delicate unjustifiable moral sensabuilities because the gay community wanted what it wanted and it wanted it now. Consistency and principles be damned. Their diolauge was reworked to say they wanted rights from the government where as before they demanded government no longer legislate what they deemed morally natural or religionsly correct. And so pedo activism was isolated and the frequent jailing of the activist ignored because the gay community no longer cared. After all, they where getting there rights now, so what did it matter?

I don't like most humans just as most humans would not like me if I was honest, but I was never raised with american sensabuilities so I was never raised to respect those who did not conduct themselves respectfully, but I do not hate them. However there is one stipulation, no pedo should openly support gay rights and should in fact side with the religious right. They are just as bad, but they need reinforcing and the gays don't want us? So why should we care if they are persecuted with unfair practices. Support them until their mistake is realized and they are willing to sit back down with us. Silent suffering is not the answer so I'll continue to support fundamentalism until either one side excepts us or they weaken from decades of mutilating each other. This is politics and we should play by the gay lobbies own rules.