GirlChat #575986


Re: Seriously!?

Posted by Dissident on 2013-May-26 04:18:14 EDT, Sunday
In reply to Re: Seriously!? posted by Butterfly Kisses on 2013-May-26 01:01:14 EDT, Sunday

  Views: 2    Likes: 0     

-I hope I am always cordial even when someone is clearly angry with me. When reading all my messages keep that in mind. I rarely get angry. Unless someone is attacking someone I love.

Thank you. And worry not, you will never find me attacking Abby for any reason!

-It is required of any person to report this. Under penalty of years in prison if you don't.

I need to do some research on areas of the world where this is the case. It doesn't sound like any state in the U.S. that I'm aware of.

Not that it matters as I would report it in any case.

Thank you for reminding us of this again LOL Now I will, in turn, extend the same courtesy and remind you that I would not report it if it was consensual, as I do not want to needlessly destroy the lives of at least one - but potentially two - human beings.

-Any case of a child having a sexual relationship with an adult is considered molestation. The mother would consider any case being molestation. Since even if it is completely consensual the psychologist/psychiatrists, and people in authority will tell her that anything that happened to her is the worse thing that could possibly happen to her based on that and the previous two facts, I consider any sexual contact with her by an adult to be molestation.

The legal definition of the term, and the dubious usage of the word during the brainwashing done to an underager forced into "therapy" for a consensual relationship while serious iatrogenic harm is being done to the unwilling "patient", does not make it "molestation" in actuality. Deliberately using a word in such a fashion to get a specific emotional reaction out of people along with its clear ability to obfuscate the facts of a case is not only intellectually dishonest, but a major instance of dirty pool IMO. Moreover, it also actually validates the severe iatrogenic harm done to the underager forced into "therapy," as if the damaging acts of the unscrupulous MHP in question should be overlooked simply because most of mainstream society currently has no problem with it. Hence, I will always oppose the indiscriminate use of words such as "molestation," "rape," or "abuse" then they do not apply in actuality.

-See above. Due to any kind of contact being seen as molestation and due to the fact that it will be put into Abby's mind that what happened was molestation I will take it in all cases to be molestation.

Which is, as noted above, an act of validation for iatrogenic harm, and placing full blame on the hypothetical MAP she was involved with instead...for what reason, exactly? Because the parents would agree with it, perhaps? Or the majority of society would approve?

This is another matter I ask you to ponder for a bit. I also have a few book recommendations for you if you are so inclined to do some research into unfamiliar but important territory.


Dissident


This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses