GirlChat #494090
'art industry criteria'?
Posted by CatcherintheRye on 2010-March-09 14:13:17 EST, Tuesday
In reply to Child porn laws impose costs on artists posted by JE on 2010-March-10 00:05:55 EST, Wednesday
such a concept should never exist for a true artist.
The reforms will also reduce the trauma of police, prosecutors and juries involved in child pornography cases by using random samples to represent the body of child abuse images rather than analysing every single one.
Why not analyze every single one, instead of making broad generalizations on the concept?
And victims in child pornography cases will be allowed to give evidence via CCTV and cross-examination by the accused will be prevented.
What exactly does that that mean??
Doesn't the accused in any case or trial have the right to cross-examination??
Vice president of the Victims of Crime Assistance League Howard Brown said the government's legislation was a balanced response to what can be a grey area.
If there's a grey area, it should be treated as such. Making it into a black and white issue is never the right approach.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- indeed - Moony on 2010-March-10 01:02:58 EST, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 4)
- I think it's incredibly silly... - Dissident on 2010-March-10 04:17:14 EST, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 3)
- that's nothing . . . - Baldur on 2010-March-10 09:51:09 EST, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 2)
- This is actually the end of a decently effective - Stahntii on 2010-March-11 09:58:49 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: that's nothing . . . - Little Girl Lover on 2010-March-10 11:29:14 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- that's nothing . . . - Baldur on 2010-March-10 09:51:09 EST, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 2)
- I think it's incredibly silly... - Dissident on 2010-March-10 04:17:14 EST, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 3)