This is about what I expected

From your review, it sounds like she treated us fairly, but decided (from having society's view thrown at her unopposed all her life, or whatever other reason) to come to a conclusion that contradicts the evidence. I expected the respectful presentation of our views, and I expected that we (all those who are pro-choice and respect children's wishes) would strongly disagree with her conclusions, so I'm not surprised by either. I don't think she "dishonestly" stated as a conclusion something she didn't believe in, I think she remains unconvinced. But as non-MAAs go, I think she's one of the ones most likely to be convinced later, not like some who have come here (Zinnanti comes to mind) and wasted our time in pointless flamefests.