From your review, it sounds like she treated us fairly, but decided (from having society's view thrown at her unopposed all her life, or whatever other reason) to come to a conclusion that contradicts the evidence. I expected the respectful presentation of our views, and I expected that we (all those who are pro-choice and respect children's wishes) would strongly disagree with her conclusions, so I'm not surprised by either. I don't think she "dishonestly" stated as a conclusion something she didn't believe in, I think she remains unconvinced. But as non-MAAs go, I think she's one of the ones most likely to be convinced later, not like some who have come here (Zinnanti comes to mind) and wasted our time in pointless flamefests.