Re: More about Canada's 'Family violence initiative'

Well, they later refer to it as "purported consent", so for them it's not something that should be considered, which I think is a huge mistake, they are turning things up to work with their own crooked views of things (they would say that of us), they are doing "selective attention" (they would again say that of us), in order to justify their fears instead of working them out, they ignore some things, they close their eyes to something that is incredibly important, what the child wants, they make them suffer a GREAT deal (coming from past experiences as an adult that I could witness regarding this subject), but it's of course always for their own good, and they even manage to make the adolescents and adults later on THANK THEM for saving them from evil manipulation and exploitation...

They first create the context in which the children are being preys for all sorts of horrors, then are being thanked for saving them.

Hmm... I've seen that before, "create a problem, then offer a solution"...

I remember a "therapist" at the "therapy" place finally admitting after some long talk that yes children could maybe have a sexual life with adults, but that "it would be too much work to build such a context, we would have to check at what age it can start and all, forget it"...

Well miss therapist, if you're too lazy and prefer the EASY way out it doesn't mean that everyone else feels that way, and I would surely love to work on this personally even if it means a lot of work, and I'm sure OTHER PEOPLE would want to offer their time and energy on that also, as some now see how IMPORTANT this is, and some people actually care about the children's well being, not just their own selfish lazyness...

But then again what do I know huh?
I'm only there for having quick satisfaction of my sexual urges and use the child as a mere object aren't I?

Or I'm only looking for affection which I could surely get somewhere else with a person in my own age range huh? (coming from her again)...

I'm not giving you anymore authority over my life poor stupid woman.

She was also the one that later on reported to the judge that I was bringing studies that were inapropriate to the group therapy (studies from ipce.info), and that there were possibly also child pornography images in that envelope (yeah, I'm so stupid that I would bring things like that to a court-backed therapy place, come on...)

The studies I brought were to offer the other side that is being ignored but that very well exists and to talk about it. They didn't like that.

She said that I'm "destroying everything I did" (the well known "mental reconstruction" of the person)...

If I indeed did destroy in very little time what you took a long time to build then miss it probably wasn't built on very solid grounds now wasn't it?

And besides, if you would've heard what the 'therapy' clients (yes we were called clients) were saying right after the 'therapy' I think you would've got into a depression...

Love2