Stop insulting me

If you disagree, contradict it with this 'proof' you talk about. If you're not willing to go out of your way to provide that and just assume everyone knows where it is (and agrees with it) then you could save yourself additional effort by not replying at all. It makes replying easier if there are less commentators, and more quality replies that create a progressive conversation.

Furthermore, it's rather odd how, when speaking disrespectfully to me, your capitalization contradicts this by upper-casing 'you' in reference to me and lowercasing 'I' in reference to you. If that's an attempt to calm down a reaction it has the reverse effect.

You have used a straw man argument here, implying I said that people are attracted to their hand. I didn't. Don't do that anymore. I don't appreciate the misdirecting and depricating sarcasm. You know very well that masturbation is using the hand in combination with imagination to have a sexual release.

If you are referring to the absence of interpersonal relations which real relationships provide, that would be a good point, only you can have those in asexual interpersonal relationships. Sex is not required to have that benefit. Essentially, you can pursue these needs separately. Someone is not being abused or neglected simply because they aren't combining sexual release with interpersonal relationships.

Your third reply is further sarcasm. I'm not going to talk to you if you're going to be arguing straw men (presumably extremist antis) rather than my actual comments.

I do not see how calling masturbation prevention abusive contradicts other positions I hold. Rather than insult my intelligence for failing to make the connection, please simply just make the connection. If you would actually support your accusations you would come across as not only even more intelligent, but also helpful. Instead, I wonder why you hold back. Is it because you are not actually able to explain this supposed contradiction?

Alright, I'll fulfill your request to explain why I don't think interference counts as sexual abuse. I agree, if you do adamently disagree with this it is good for me to back this up to convince you. As an initial research platform: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_abuse

"Sexual abuse, also referred to as molestation, is the forcing of undesired sexual acts by one person upon another."

Stopping desired sexual acts is not forcing undesired sexual acts. So, I leave it up to you to present YOUR definition (along with source) which does include sexual repression as a form of sexual abuse. I do not think it fits the definition. It may abuse personal freedoms, and involve psychological or physical abuse, but I don't understand how it would fit under 'sexual abuse', sorry.