self contradicting much?

Sex isn't like air or food or mental stimulation, it is not sexual abuse to withhold sex.

As long as You continue to insist on things that have positively been proven false, You're impossible to argue with. If You want to believe the sun travels around the earth, fine, but i won't shut up about it.

Furthermore, it is impossible to forcibly sexually deprive somebody because of the existance of masturbation. To deprive that requires other forms of abuse.

However, i have never heard of anyone attracted to their hand. i assume such people exists, but the fact i've never heard anyone say so makes me believe they are rare to the extreme.

For example, to stop people from instinctively doing this, they physically abuse them by pulling their hand away, or psychologically abuse them by telng them is bad.

It's not physical abuse to take their hand away, because they are preventing the kid from scarring themselves for life - so arguably they are avoiding greater danger, aren't they?

It's not psychological abuse to tell them it's bad. After all, a kid would fail a test about what is good and bad, isn't it? so they need parents and teachers and whatever else to tell them.

The incredible thing is not that You hold the position that masturbation prevention is abusive; but that You don't see how that contradicts other positions You also hold.

That is not sexual abuse though. Sexual abuse involves sexual interaction, not interference with it. Sorry.

Interesting definition You use.

Do You, by any chance, see the implied contradiction with Your first statement in this post???

Well, truth be told, there is a way to reconcile that, but then it contradicts Your masturbatory statements. In any case, the three cannot be simultaneously true, and even two would be hard to sustain IRL.

Now, can You explain to me why Sexual abuse involves sexual interaction, not interference with it, or You just want me to take Your word as final, inerrant and irrevocable dogma, as usual??