Dear Mr. Zinnanti,

I am hopeful that this correspondence is genuine, and not a 'spoof' of your e-mail address by someone acting maliciously.

I am fairly aware of the circumstances of the civil proceeding. I read your initial complaint, the two orders, and spoke to reporters who attended both the TRO hearing, the town hall meeting, and the permanent injunction trial.

You are a difficult person to assess from a distance. Your behavior, at times, appeared humanistic and compassionate (as did Mr. Tebo's and Ms. Rose's, in my opinion). At other times, you seemed to me to be opportunistic and willing to sacrifice a (by all appearances) homeless man on disability for a mental disorder to benefit yourself. I didn't reach any conclusive opinion on that matter, but rather found it difficult to sort out.

I did not feel that your complaint was well drafted, but then I am not a lawyer, either. It failed to explicitly state a tortious theory (such as assault, the tort you appeared to plead by the fact pattern in the complaint). I initially thought it was a statutory complaint under the domestic violence laws, and failed to plead the statute. I also thought it was a de facto class action (by virtue of the large number of 'Doe' complainants) and that, had Mr. McClellan been represented, the issue of improper joinder should have been raised.

I thought the Judge committed misconduct when he ordered relief in excess of the pleadings on a TRO. A complaint has been made to the California state judicial conduct commission by a member of the California Bar. I thought Mr. McClellan should have removed the matter to District Court under diversity jurisdiction, to secure a fair and impartial trier of law.

My advocacy issues center around forging a compromise between 'pedophiles' and society, such that the community I belong to may live in peace here, even if they do not enjoy all of the natural rights endowed to men under our system of governance. As it stands, we enjoy no protection of law for crimes committed against us, no rights to property, and a tyranny of numbers that appears to seek our violend ends. It is emotionally distressing to live in such an environment, and fundamentally unfair to a community composed - by and large - of decent human beings who would not place their own interests ahead of harm to others.

Sincerely,

Kevin Brown