I was hoping this was from a disinterested news source.

Apparently it's from someone with a (legitimate) ax to grind.

It may very well be 100% true but it's hard to tell with the apparent conflict of interest   /cgi/deref.cgi?url=http://annabelleigh.net/messages/406208.htm  .

Of course, those who say the author has a conflict of interest not only have their own conflict of interest, but at least one of them (the cso page) has known reliability problems (as in: don't believe anything they say without verifying it for yourself).