I was hoping this was from a disinterested news source.
Apparently it's from someone with a (legitimate) ax to grind.
It may very well be 100% true but it's hard to tell with the ⛓️💥[Removed].
Of course, those who say the author has a conflict of interest not only have their own conflict of interest, but at least one of them (the cso page) has known reliability problems (as in: don't believe anything they say without verifying it for yourself).
GirlChat #406252
damn, source is biased :(
Posted by d on 2007-August-28 21:31:58 EDT, Tuesday
In reply to PJ MEMBERS IMPLICATED IN ONLINE CHILD PORNOGRAPHY posted by webmanager_critest on 2007-August-28 09:13:09 EDT, Tuesday
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
0 Responses