GirlChat #357330

Start A New Topic!  Submit SRF  Thread Index  Date Index  

Re: Personal Attacks on Anti-Pedos

Posted by Demosthenes on Saturday, June 10 2006 at 10:54:26PM
In reply to Personal Attacks on Anti-Pedos posted by Rookiee on Saturday, June 10 2006 at 10:12:02PM

Angry Momma, while being resolute in spreading mistruths and hate, was at least a decent human being. She also was confident enough in her position to allow open discussion with us. Dreamer of Oz is a coward and a bully, too scared of what would happen if she didn't censor us and allowed us to be heard alongside her that she refers to anything that she receives as hate mail.

While I agree that no one should be out there sending these people personal attacks, it has been mentioned more than once that these personal attacks that she speaks of are mostly calm and reasonable attempts at communication. These people view anyone saying anything contrary to their hate propaganda as an enemy personally attacking them. It is pathetic and it is sad. If, however, any of you people have sent actual hate messages and personal attacks.. shame on you. We have won the battles that we have so far by taking the moral high ground, not lowering ourselves to their level.

Actually, allow me to return to Angry Momma for a second. This person was an intelligent woman who bought all of the lies against us, but was capable of knowing truth when she heard it. She likely was even capable of eventually accepting all of the truth and ending her campaign of hate. I respect her and regret her disappearance.

Unfortunately, this does lead us back to Dreamer of Oz. This person created one sight to push hate propaganda and to attempt to increase the pedo hysteria. Now that they have seen the reaction that actually does happen in these cases, they are lashing out like a bully that has been stood up to. They create this new site and slap on the front page "This site is created in response to an attack", which we could rightfully do in response to her original page even existing. She labels it as an attack because it makes the other antis rally to her cause.

I must agree on one point, though. Debatecrime does not help our cause. I may be militant, but he is a loose cannon that usually manages to serve the purpose of forcing the rest of us to follow in his wake and clean up the mess. Slvrspun's only problem was taking the last step and adding "or kill them", and Minstrel's only problem was using the word "bitch" to refer to this hate monger. I find it quite humorous that Dreamer of Oz decided to quote LGsinmyheart, as it only weakens her position.. and I'm almost hurt that I wasn't quoted. Oh woe is me! Then again, I didn't bother to post in that particular thread and maybe she only bothered to read the ones about her. It wouldn't help her cause to go quoting the majority of posts here, so I don't blame her overly much. Perhaps this post will give her something to work with and she can make me famous like magnolia did. ^_^ (If you're reading this.. Thanks MagZ!! *huggles* I love you, you child hating lie monger!)

Demosthenes

Demosthenes





Follow ups:

Post a response :

Nickname Password
E-mail (optional)
Subject







Link URL (optional)
Link Title (optional)

Add your sigpic?