Call Me Crazy...

The article looks NPOV to me. I'm all for pedophile activism or the childlove movement, but IMHO wikipedia isn't a place to advocate for anything. I know that as pedophiles we are desperate to get the message out anyway we can, and a encyclopedia that anyone can edit seems like a great way to get our message out. IMO, pro-ped nuthugging on wikipedia is just as bad as anti-ped nuthugging. Wikipedia should reflect reality, not idealism. When I saw the recent wikipedia page I saw a lot of the positive facts such as 90% of child sex offenders being situational offenders and not pedophiles. But a lot of what was written in the past on the pedophilia page was anecdoctal fluff about Brazilians accepting 20-somethings dating 14 year olds, which is a nice change to the American view of things, but has nothing to do with factual information on pedophilia. Posting at wikipedia should not just be an excuse to score points for the home team, as tempting as it may be.