"I don't really know sites that you have to pay for to recieve written erotica. Seems kind of silly to me since there is so much free stuff out there."

Then we vary heavily on what we consider to be the erotic mainstream for the purpose of establishing legality. Anyone actually commercially publishing has a very different stake than anons uploading.

Most caselaw has been derived by those actually publishing, and who therefore had RL IDs linked so that they could profit.

We should let the caselaw lead our notions of legality. And not argue that Phillip Greaves was arrested but Anon wasn't so it must be legal 'till Anon is arrested too.

Its a dangerous game that we play when we conflate "still standing" with "legally protected speech."

Dante