GirlChat #605005

Start A New Topic!  Submit SRF  Thread Index  Date Index  

Re: Coming Out vs. the Toybox

Posted by EthanEdwards on Saturday, November 01 2014 at 07:52:37AM
In reply to Re: Coming Out vs. the Toybox posted by Dante on Saturday, November 01 2014 at 03:16:46AM

Your first set of arguments are just hilariously wrong. You are there like an 8-year-old boy standing with arms crossed, contradicting everything just for the sake of not admitting they're wrong. Can't argue with someone acting like that. If anyone else who shows signs of using rational thought wants to know about one or two, I'll lay it out for them.

I'm for people having the option of reparative therapies IF any worked well. The APA says none of the existing ones work. So you say I'm in favor of reparative therapies that the APA says don't work? Give me a break.

Puzzling does not equal wrong. Nor does it nullify consent nor negate whatever one side of a contract got out of it for failure to comprehend what the other did. I thought I was creating art for its own sake. You commissioned my mural because you believe that art improves character. I can't understand the supposed benefit to you. But I gain anyway.

So the laws of contracts and fair exchange are to operate inside a little girl's panties. Sounds terrific for the image of girl-lovers.

The grown-up offers the little girl a shiny dime for her grubby $20 bill. What's wrong with that? She got a shiny dime, and that's what she wanted.

Tell me how anyone could prove to your satisfaction that a child consented and THEN maybe we will talk about an increase. But from what I gather, you would hold to a hypothetical 5%, while still having no ground for any among them to prove that they ARE a member of this statistical probability. What would it take for a child to prove her consent to you herself?

She can't prove it ahead of time. This doesn't bother me. (If she's 13 I've told you on several occasions how she can be part of forgiveness afterwards.)

Analogy time. Suppose that we find $200 missing from the company till over the weekend. Frank admits he took it home with him. His defense is he was just borrowing it and going to have it back by Monday morning. I think he can be punished for theft from the company. But that's not fair! you say. In a case where he really was going to bring it back, how can he prove it? Quite possibly he can't. The rule is an approximation and that's often good enough.






Follow ups:

Post a response :

Nickname Password
E-mail (optional)
Subject







Link URL (optional)
Link Title (optional)

Add your sigpic?