"the Virped position that what science says cannot be relied upon, and thus can be readily dismissed in favor of majority public sentiment."

"This is not a VP position, and I don't think you believe it is either."

If you weren't the one who just made a post citing Rind's science and arguing that it should be weighed against what "CSA survivors" believe, then your account has been hacked.

"even survivors of genuine abuse are iatrogenically conditioned and sociogenically encouraged by a certain pervasive school of thought to be "damaged" severely rather than heal, because it benefits a certain lucrative and socially influential industry"

"Some of that occurs. To say that the vast majority of harm comes from that is a giant conspiracy theory."

But it pales into comparison against the "conspiracy theory" required to deny the reality of the Satanic Panic cases across so many different locales and jurisdictions and throughout such a vast number of cases over a span of years.

And yet, we now know what happened.

"You assume my motives, a foregone conclusion, and a lack of integrity. I could with equal justification speculate that for you as an individual youth liberation is an emotionally compelling rationale for hoping to allow adult-child sex."

"Could?"

Lets not be facetious.

You did and have said those very things.

Dante