It got me thinking about paedosexuality and incest. Incest as in, pairing. Is the willingness to partake in this kind of incest more common with pedosexuals? Or is it simply because of the lack of available partners outside the family because of social conditions that cause many paedosexuals to pair with those available to them?

In my experience, I think the second question you asked above pretty much hit the nail on the head. In my experience, incestuous relationships are spoken of more commonly amongst GLer's than BLer's. And I think you mentioned the reason why it's largely true. Male BLer's can form many sorts of relationships with boys outside the family that is not considered problematic or "creepy" to society at large, even in the midst of three and a half decades of the sex abuse hysteria. It's simply seen as a "male bonding" thing, or considered natural even in our culture for boys to bond with male role models, even if they aren't related to them.

With men and girls, it's obviously much more "questionable" when such bonds are formed in our contemporary Western and Northern super-culture. This often leaves male GLer's with little choice but to form such bonds with girls related to them, i.e., nieces, younger cousins, etc., since only those types of "bondings" between men and girls are readily accepted in today's society. An exception, of course, would be men who coach and train girls in various athletics, etc., but even those types of close bonds can be looked upon with suspicion today if the two are seen as getting "too" close with each other.

As for my feelings on incest in general: I do not consider incest in general to be any sort of intimate connection to adult attraction to underage minors, despite the common societal stereotypes and prejudices that have connected the two.

I do not encourage it nor favor it in any way, for many reasons. Hence, it's not part of the repertoire of mutually consensual sexual relations that I personally endorse for greater acceptance. However... and please let me make this clear... I do not think it should be considered a crime worthy of imprisonment or subject to extreme societal condemnation when it happens. Most of the time, it wouldn't say anything "bad" about someone's character simply for engaging in such consensual relations with a sibling, and those discovered to have been in such a relationship should not be subject to ostracizing, loss of employment, or any other type of harmful censure.

I am much less in favor of such relations between parents and their children in this day and age for largely the same reason as I would not favor similar relations between the pre-Civil War plantation owners and their chattel slaves: Children under today's laws, like the slaves back then, are not in a position where they can readily say "no." Parents have too much legally enforced power over their kids, and while such lawfully sanctioned power does not extend to the sexual realm, it still places their children in a legally disadvantaged position, as parents have the power to punish or censure kids in various ways that adults who lack such direct legal power and authority over them do not. There are also specific types of emotional bonds formed between parents and children, at least in today's world due to the hierarchical nature of the nuclear family unit, that makes such pairings further problematical.

Depending upon specific circumstances, however, I have no problems whatsoever with cousins having such liaisons, though depending on how close-knit they are within their particular family, the forming of monoamorous pairings between the two can cause problems. But I do not believe, by any means, that it calls for legal action or forceful separation of the liaisons.

I hope this was helpful.