I apologize for being pessimistic.

I am probably made more paranoid about this because I know this history (which isn't very often spoken about) rather well and how the precedents don't bode well for the populations who are tested.

It may be made less bad - though I still think it is impossible to be made entirely objective. But I was even more compelled to answer because nobody really questioned the idea of testing (Dante questioned whether the rationale was liberty-enhancing or liberty-limiting, and Baldur whether sex should be given the unique importance implied by a specialized test; but neither criticism entirely invalidates the idea of testing in itself.) I think the idea of testing is itself questionable.

But hey, it is a popular idea. Even Dissident endorses it.