GirlChat #601518
Even rainbowloom is not really undecided. Everything points towards being pro-contact except the label.
Being pro-contact doesn't mean that we believe that every child (or any particular child) should be sexual with an adult, and it certainly doesn't mean that we believe that adult-child sex is harmless in the here and now. We simply attribute that harm mostly to iatrogenic and sociogenic factors - while also taking the risks of disease, differences in size, and potential personal conflicts into account. The latter risks we can mitigate - but the iatrogenic and sociogenic factors cannot be easily resolved right now. Still, those of us who are pro-contact don't believe that adult-child sex is inherently wrong. As 28 used to say, "don't take children swimming in polluted waters" - but it is in everyone's interest if we try to clean up those waters so that we will all have a clean environment in the future. In such an environment, the choice whether to go swimming should belong with the child. But I am glad that you recognize that your frustration with rainbowloom is in part frustration with your past self. That you are able to be critical of yourself is a good sign, but know when to stop. That is in the past, and you have done well - you may not have been the first to come to your senses, but you are still ahead of most. |