Without the cold hard evidence in front of them, people tend to believe what they want to believe. It's very possible that Luftetari is a a fake pedo, a saboteur, a troll of some sort. It's hard for me to fathom that there are people here who actually believe that this was a consensual relationship, given the fact that incest almost never is.

I remember a time when most GCers recognized this fact (remember the Ken Lanning discussions about pedophiles v. situational offenders?)--now many GCers seem to have completely chucked that out the window for the more satisfying (to them) belief that all examples of adult-child sexual interaction are consensual until proven otherwise. Logic alone dictates this is bullshit, but whatever helps you sleep at night . . .