"There is a distinction to be drawn between what I believe and what I think that most of society believes."

And you erase that line when you turn societal acceptance into evidence and you turn "society must have its reasons" into valid motives.

You have never said "what society believes erroneously." Nor offered proof that they're informed or correct. And yet your reaction to their assertions is to treat them as self-evident.

And yet despite all this, you fail to treat the arguments against the Status Quo that VirPed tenders the same way. When you challenge the Pedo/Molester conflation you don't argue that this will only come across as a cynical lust motivated effort by molesters to make Nons relax their guard.

Why is this presumed ( but not cited ) societal belief relevant to CoA challenges but irrelevant to the Monster Myth.

When we affirm that some myths are erroneous, you silence is by affirming false doubts. But you fail to follow the same standard for what you claim.

Its one thing to focus on an issue. Its another thing to disparage the issues of others by holding two different standards.

Dante