"I belive me too that more homosexuals rights grow more Gls rights get detriment"

Then you believe falsely. Rights are not a zero-sum game.

( * sheesh * This was just pointed out this week. )

"even bcz people are secretly homophobes but can't express it and so hit Bls and we get same persecution by law bcz in liberal state it is not possible to discriminate"

So THAT'S why homophobia disappeared utterly, and there's no current legislature permitting businesses from refusing to serve gays? ;p

Stats demonstrate that many homophobes are closeted self-loathing gays. Since the anger is being directed precisely on-target, there is no need to displace it onto what it is not.

( And besides, weren't you attempting to argue here that the "lobby" was successful in culturally disassociating Pedophile homosexuality from teleio-homosexuality several generations back? Why would those who grew up believing that one has nothing to do with the other suddenly see the light only when they're thinking more poorly and clouded by anger? )

"in fact Gls are still accepted where homosexuality is not accepted and it is for example in islam"

Please demonstrate where the exclusive Pedophile and the girl who asserts the right to freely chose him are accepted by a Muslim culture? I'll wait for the citation.

"and more than that homos hit us directly and women that has same feeling of homos and so same compassion support them against us"

I'm not even sure what this is supposed to mean. But it would come as a massive surprise to William S Burroughs that hetero-Women feel the same as homosexuals; when he wrote so much to point out that this is not the case. "And which of you gents is the 'woman?,' " is just as meaningful as pretending that Pedos want a pseudo-teleiophile relationship by treating the girl exactly as if she were a woman. ( "Which of you initiates penetrative intercourse? You or the preschooler?" )

"I think people hardly will accept Bls maybe Gls bcz generaly they think homosexual initiation do become gay"

And yet both you, I and everyone else concluded that this is not the case.

Sure, some cultures do. But usually those cultures distinguish between the heterosexual role in sodomy and the role which confers homosexuality. ( "Which one of you gents is the 'woman?' " )

"and them in '70 pedophile activism was made by Bls and homosexuals , it exist a NAMBLA but not a NAMGLA why?"

Let me count the ways:

Because it emerged out of a gay-rights movement where there were no hetero-rights marchers protesting for acceptance?

Because while Led Zeppelin were being seduced by teen groupies without any stigma intergen homosexuals were a loathed subset of a loathed subset?

Because if you can accept the outlier, by definition you can accept their already more tolerated relative?

Of course they couldn't foresee their betrayal by the teleiophile homosexuals. Nor that this would lead to the elimination of the "recruitment" slander. Nor that the latter would lead to boys being seen in general as less vulnerable than girls are to Pedophiles; and therefore a shifting of who is the greater "victim" in the culture of victimology.

But yeah, in general when someone else is taking the bullet on your behalf, asking for parity seems kinda strange.

Dante