I could either reply to what you have said.

Eg. I thought I explained that an interpolated assumption ( one which was not present in the statement you claimed to be responding to ) makes the response both indirect and dishonest.

OR, I could reply with, "Pomegranites."

Where "Pomegranites" is the response to the thought experiment in which your above post, while stating one thing, is really a request for the name of an obscure fruit.

If you cannot see that the latter is not a direct response to a direct question, then there's little hope for dialogue.

And at least the "fruit request" assumption, while equally irrelevant, doesn't impugn your motives and morals, nor introduce a slur of the Antis' creation into a supposedly respectful dialogue with real Pedos who are here.

Dante