Yes, but...

The specific person I was quoting I'd guess is more likely to have not seen the images in question than had. And goes so far as to call it "blatant" child pornography. This is all subjective, yes, but to refer to these images as blatant CP- with or without seeing them- shows that this person hasn't any credibility whatsoever. If it was blantantly child pornography, this story would have read differently.

If you think the authorities can step in and shut down Hardmans website, think again. Under Florida law what Hardman is doing is absolutely legal because the parents have given consent. WFTV, who reported on David Hardman several years ago for another website he created, says that Hardman is careful not to step over the boundaries and break the law.

That > some random person on the internet.