Re: modeling site under fire

Typical double action going on here. "13 year olds in thongs etc is not modeling. it's child porn" I don't care how much a prude she is, I sincerely doubt she'd call a woman in a thong "pornographic." The age of the wearer only effects the level of provocation in the eye of the beholder. Or looks, gender, what have you...point is, a thong is a thong is a thong. It's either pornographic or it's not. And LOD is right, you'll find it's typically who cannot earn five hundred a shoot wearing a thong who complain the loudest.

Baldur, I thought you were about to post about WEBE, and I was wondering why you were so behind on the loop on that one. : P But, no, it's the other Fl. company. The article states the girls range from ten to seventeen, but I'll assure you, in very strong favor toward seventeen. Having lived in Florida for a good while myself, I expect to find girls that age wearing thongs on the beach on any given day. You also rarely see thongs on that site, in fact, and when you do it's on the oldest girls, some of whom are actually adults. Though I guess it would be outside of editorial integrity to mention any of this.

Young girl modeling. *Note, this girl was not featured on Hardman's website. Heh...the ol' "these pictures are too graphic to share"/better leave it to the reader's imagination or they'll see a non-story here play. ; ) Why even bother running a phoney picture? Especially one that looks like Johnny Ramone.